Direct-to-video


This article is about the type of film release. For All Time Low live album, see Straight to DVD (album).

Direct-to-video or straight-to-video refers to the release of a film to the public immediately on home video formats rather than a theatrical release or television broadcast.[1]


Because inferior sequels or prequels of larger-budget films may be released direct to video, review references to direct-to-video releases are often pejorative.[citation needed] Direct-to-video release has also become profitable for independent filmmakers and smaller companies.[2]




Contents





  • 1 Reasons for releasing direct to video


  • 2 Physical format releases

    • 2.1 Direct-to-video films screened theatrically


    • 2.2 Direct-to-disc or "DVD Premiere"



  • 3 Digital releases

    • 3.1 Direct-to-iTunes


    • 3.2 Direct-to-stream



  • 4 The V-Cinema and OVA markets in Japan


  • 5 See also


  • 6 References


  • 7 Further reading




Reasons for releasing direct to video


A production studio may decide not to generally release a TV show or film for several possible reasons: a low budget, lack of support from a TV network, negative reviews, its controversial nature, that it may appeal to a small niche market, or a simple lack of general public interest. Studios, limited in the annual number of films to which they grant cinematic releases, may choose to pull the completed film from the theaters, or never exhibit it in theaters at all. Studios then generate revenue through video sales and rentals.[3] Direct-to-video films are marketed mostly through colorful box covers, instead of advertising, and are not covered by publications like Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide.[4]


Direct-to-video releases have historically carried a stigma of lower technical or artistic quality than theatrical releases.[5] Some films released direct to video are films which have been completed but were never released in movie theaters. This delay often occurs when a studio doubts a film's commercial prospects justify a full cinema release, or because its release window has closed. In film industry slang, such films are referred to as having been "vaulted".[6] Like B-movies shown in drive-in theaters in the mid-20th century, direct-to-video films employ both former stars and young actors who may become stars later.[4]


Direct-to-video releases can be done for films which cannot be shown theatrically due to controversial content, or because the cost involved in a theatrical release is beyond the releasing company.[7]


Animated sequels and feature-length episodes of animated series are also often released in this fashion.[7]The Walt Disney Company began making sequels to many of its animated films for video release beginning with The Return of Jafar (the sequel to Aladdin) in 1994 and Aladdin and the King of Thieves (the second sequel to Aladdin) in 1996. Universal Studios also began their long line of The Land Before Time sequels that same year.


Some horror films that are unsuccessful in theaters, like Witchcraft, begin successful direct-to-video franchises.[4] Studios may also release sequels or spin-offs to a successful live action film straight to DVD, due to a lack of budget in comparison to the original. An example is the Behind Enemy Lines series of films.


By 1994 an average of six new direct-to-video films appeared each week. Erotic thrillers and R-rated action films were the two most successful genres.[4] The family film segment is also major part of direct-to-video sales. According to the Los Angeles Times,


Often, the downfall of live-action family films at the box office is their strength on video. Their appeal is to families with young children, who may go to only a couple of movies per year but who will watch many videos multiple times. The teens and young adults who drive blockbuster box office statistics stay away from family movies.[8]


During the Golden Age of Porn in the 1970s, many pornographic films were released in theatres, some of which became some of the highest-grossing films in their release years and in the pornography industry altogether. Towards the 1980s porn began to shift to video release, because video allowed the producers to work on extremely low budgets and dispense with some film production elements like scripts, and the increased privacy and convenience of the format change were preferred by the target market. During the 1990s, pornographers began releasing content through paysites on the Internet.



Physical format releases



Direct-to-video films screened theatrically


Occasionally, a studio that makes a movie that was prepared as a direct-to-video film will release it theatrically at the last minute due to the success of another film with a similar subject matter or an ultimate studio decision. Batman: Mask of the Phantasm is an example of this. However, despite the movie's critically acclaimed success, its box-office performance was very poor, which has been attributed to its last minute decision to be released theatrically. The film had much better commercial success in its subsequent home video releases.


Other times, a direct-to-video movie may get a limited theatrical screening in order to build excitement for the actual release of the video such as was done for 2010's Justice League: Crisis on Two Earths, Batman: The Killing Joke and Planet Hulk,[9] or 2013's Sharknado.



Direct-to-disc or "DVD Premiere"



As DVDs gradually replaced VHS videocassettes, the term "direct-to-DVD" replaced "direct-to-video" in some instances.[10] However, the word "video" does not necessarily refer to videocassettes; many publications continue to use the term "direct-to-video" for DVDs or Blu-ray discs. Both disc-based release types may also be referred to as "direct-to-disc". A new term sometimes used is "DVD premiere" (DVDP).[11] Such films can cost as little as $20 million,[12] about a third of the average cost of a Hollywood release.[13] According to Variety, American Pie: Band Camp sold a million copies in one week, despite retaining only two actors from the original trilogy.[14]


Some direct-to-DVD releases recently have tended to feature actors who were formerly bankable stars. In 2005, salaries for some of these direct-to-DVD actors in the multimillion-dollar range from $2 to $4 million (Jean-Claude Van Damme) and $4.5 to $10 million (Steven Seagal), in some cases exceeding the actors' theatrical rates.[12]



Digital releases




Direct-to-iTunes


Direct to iTunes is an online distribution method that avoids all upfront DVD production, marketing and distribution costs as well as upfront cinema distribution and marketing costs. Apple distributes the film for 30% of the revenue, while an additional 10–15% may go to the person who formats the film for iTunes compatibility.[15] The first independently produced feature-length motion picture to pursue the direct-to-iTunes marketing scheme was Ed Burns' Purple Violets, which debuted on iTunes on November 20, 2007. It was the first feature-length film to "premiere exclusively on iTunes". It was distributed exclusively on iTunes at a price of US$14.99 for a month before being made available through other distribution channels.[16] The movie, which was produced at a cost of $4 million, had premiered at the Tribeca Film Festival in April, where it was reviewed positively, but only received modest distribution offers.[15] At the time of the Purple Violets release, most studios were not distributing via iTunes early in the process and only Walt Disney Studios, which was the first movie studio to distribute via iTunes,[15] was distributing at iTunes simultaneously with DVD distribution.[17] It was not very common for consumers to make digital movie purchases at the time.[18]The Polish brothers' 2011 For Lovers Only, which had virtually no production costs and was released to iTunes on July 12, is regarded as the first profitable feature length direct-to-iTunes product.[19] The direct-to-iTunes method is also becoming common with both books and music.


When Purple Violets was released, several short films had already been distributed through iTunes. Previously, marketing of short films had been prohibitive. However, Apple distributed the February 25, 2007 79th Academy Awards nominees for the Animated Shorts, Live Action Shorts and Documentary Shorts as well as half of the 2007 Sundance Film Festival shorts, beginning a new era.[15]



Direct-to-stream



Due to the growth of YouTube and other video-streaming websites, premieres of long-form films increasingly occur through online streams. Long-form films to premiere on YouTube or other sites include Home (2009), The Cult of Sincerity (2008), Life in a Day (2011), Eyes and Ears of God: Video Surveillance of Sudan (2012) and Zeitgeist: The Movie (2007). In 2010, Striker was the first Indian film to premiere on YouTube on the same day as it was premiered in theaters.


In 2013, the Netflix and Amazon Video subscription video streaming services began to release original content.



The V-Cinema and OVA markets in Japan


See also: Original video animation and Category:Japanese direct-to-video films

Japanese live action V-Cinema may serve as a stepping stone to greater things. Naoko Iijima started her career appearing on late night TV variety, and then focused on such V-Cinema titles as Strawberry Times 4 and Zero Woman: Final Mission (Zero WOMAN　警視庁０課の女 Zero Woman: Keishichō 0-ka no onna) before moving into a career in mainstream movies and TV. Cult director Takashi Miike has released quite a few of his works as V-Cinema perhaps preferring the freedom. Weather Report Girl (1995) starring Kei Mizutani is a rare case of a work being released to video, and then recalled by the maker, and released to theatres to considerable success. V-Cinema may be used for the sequels to a successful feature film (e.g. Zero Woman, Sasori, Kunoichi Ninpoden, Baka Yaro or Pantsu no Ana). The content can be sexier or more violent than a mainstream feature film.


In the case of anime, this is called original video animation (sometimes capitalized, and abbreviated OVA or OAV). They're often used to tell stories too short to fill a full TV season, or to take creative risk without pressures from TV studios and sponsoring companies[20] and were particularly common in the early 1990s. Sometimes OVAs garner enough interest to justify commissioning a full TV show, such as Tenchi Muyo!, El Hazard, and Read or Die.


With the convenience of the 13-episode season format, OVAs are less common now. The majority of OVAs released in today's market are usually continuations or reworkings of recently completed TV shows. For instance, the DVD release of a TV show might, as a sales hook, include a bonus episode that was never broadcast.



See also


  • Video on demand

  • B movie

  • Home video

  • First run (filmmaking)

  • First-run syndication

  • List of animated direct-to-video series

  • List of Disney direct-to-video films

  • List of best-selling films in the United States

  • Television film


  • Category:Direct-to-video films for a list of direct-to-video productions


References




  1. ^ Alvarez, Max J (1994-12-30). "Big Names Look For Bright Lights In Videoland". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 2010-12-07. 


  2. ^ Lerman, Laurence (September 17, 2001). "Independents' 'Bread and Butter'". Video Business. 21 (38). Section: Video Premieres. 


  3. ^ Barlow, Aaron (2005). The DVD Revolution: Movies, Culture, and Technology. Praeger/Greenwood. p. 19. ISBN 0-275-98387-0. Films that flop in theaters or which are never theatrically released can prove profitable through longer-term video and DVD sales. 


  4. ^ abcd Alvarez, Max J. (1994-12-30). "Big Names Look For Bright Lights In Videoland". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 2018-07-22. 


  5. ^ Goodale, Gloria (October 23, 1998). "'Straight to Video' Picks up Steam". Christian Science Monitor. 


  6. ^ Bernstein, Adam (2004-12-12). "Silent Films Speak Loudly for Hughes". The Washington Post. TVWeek p. Y06.  |access-date= requires |url= (help)


  7. ^ ab "More Films Jump Straight to DVD". USA Today. August 6, 2003. Section: Life, p. 03d. 


  8. ^ Matzer, Marla (1997-04-16). "Direct-to-Video Family Films Are Hitting Home". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 4 June 2011. 


  9. ^ Justice League: Crisis on Two Earths gets big-screen Premieres on Two Coasts - Comicmix.com - February 5, 2010


  10. ^ Berardinelli, James. "DVD's Scarlet Letter". Retrieved 2007-01-13. 


  11. ^ For one example of the term "DVDP" in use, see "Paramount grows DVDP slate". Retrieved 2007-01-13. 


  12. ^ ab DVD Exclusive Online. "Stars, Money Migrate To DVDP (archived)". Archived from the original on 2006-05-15. Retrieved 2007-01-13. 


  13. ^ Mueller, Anne (23 Jun 2011). "Why Movies Cost So Much to Make". Investopedia US. IAC. Retrieved 24 Jul 2014. . As of 2007[update], the average production cost was $65 million, and distribution and marketing added about another $35 million, for a total of around $100 million


  14. ^ Hettrick, Scott (January 2, 2005). "Spending on DVDs up 10%". Variety. Retrieved 2007-01-13. 


  15. ^ abcd Halbfinger, David M. (2007-10-23). "Facing Competition, iTunes Revs Up Its Film Section". The New York Times. Retrieved 2011-08-25. 


  16. ^ Graser, Marc (2007-10-25). "Ed Burns offers 'Violets' on iTunes: Feature to skip theatrical release". Variety. Retrieved 2011-08-25. 


  17. ^ "Edward Burns - Movie Going Direct To Itunes". contactmusic.com. 2007-10-25. Retrieved 2011-08-25. 


  18. ^ Kirsner, Scott (2007-11-02). "Studio's Digital Dilemma: Apple Calling Shots as Biz Tries To Control Market". Variety. Retrieved 2011-08-26. 


  19. ^ "Stana Katic and Mark Polish Interview about For Lovers Only on Bloomberg West". YouTube. Bloomberg News. 2011-08-24. Retrieved 2011-08-25. 


  20. ^ "Anime UK". 1 (1). 1991. 



Further reading



  • Mayo, Mike (1997). VideoHound's Video Premieres: The Only Guide to Video Originals and Limited Releases. Visible Ink Press. ISBN 0-7876-0825-4. 

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Executable numpy error

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP Executable numpy error I'm trying to create an executable file for my code. I've already tried with cx_Freeze and with pyinstaller. Both gives me the same error, which is: "Missing required dependencies 0.format(missing_dependencies))" PS C:UsersGustavoDesktopbuildexe.win32-3.6> python AgendaOficial.py C:UsersGustavoAppDataLocalProgramsPythonPython36-32python.exe: can't open file 'AgendaOficial.py': [Errno 2] No such file or directory PS C:UsersGustavoDesktopbuildexe.win32-3.6> .AgendaOficial.exe Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:UsersGustavoAppDataLocalProgramsPythonPython36-32libsite-packagescx_Freezeinitscripts__startup__.py", line 14, in run module.run() File "C:UsersGustavoAppDataLocalProgramsPythonPython36-32libsite-packagescx_FreezeinitscriptsConsole.py", line 26, in run exec(code, m. dict ) File "AgendaOficial.py", line 8, in File "C:UsersGustavoAppDataLocal...
Read more

PySpark count values by condition

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP PySpark count values by condition I have a DataFrame, a snippet here: [['u1', 1], ['u2', 0]] basically one string ('f') and either a 1 or a 0 for second element ('is_fav'). What I need to do is grouping on the first field and counting the occurrences of 1s and 0s. I was hoping to do something like num_fav = count((col("is_fav") == 1)).alias("num_fav") num_nonfav = count((col("is_fav") == 0)).alias("num_nonfav") df.groupBy("f").agg(num_fav, num_nonfav) It does not work properly, I get in both cases the same result which amounts to the count for the items in the group, so the filter (whether it is a 1 or a 0) seems to be ignored. Does this depend on how count works? count 1 Answer 1 There is no filter here. Both col("is_fav") == 1 and col("is_fav") == 0) are just boolean expressions and count doesn't really care about their value as long a...
Read more

Mass disable jenkins jobs

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP Mass disable jenkins jobs Is it possible to disable a large number of Jenkins jobs in one go? I have a large number of jenkins job I need to disable. Visiting each job in turn and disbling is tedious. 2 Answers 2 https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Configuration+Slicing+Plugin That works beautifully install it go to http://your_jenkins.com:8080/slicing/jobdisabledbool/? By using configuration slicing plugin: By using this plugin easy to find out anything has enabled or disable jobs and timer separated jobs Manage Jenkins >Config slicing > select options By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.
Read more