Weyl's theorem on complete reducibility

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP

In algebra, Weyl's theorem on complete reducibility is a fundamental result in the theory of Lie algebra representations. Let gdisplaystyle mathfrak gmathfrak g be a semisimple Lie algebra over a field of characteristic zero. The theorem states that every finite-dimensional module over gdisplaystyle mathfrak gmathfrak g is semisimple as a module (i.e., a direct sum of simple modules.)[1]


Weyl's original proof (for complex semisimple Lie algebras) was analytic in nature: it famously used the unitarian trick. Specifically, one can show that every complex semisimple Lie algebra gdisplaystyle mathfrak gmathfrak g is the complexification of the Lie algebra of a simply connected compact Lie group Kdisplaystyle KK.[2] (If, for example, g=sl(n;C)displaystyle mathfrak g=mathrm sl (n;mathbb C )displaystyle mathfrak g=mathrm sl (n;mathbb C ), then K=SU(n)displaystyle K=mathrm SU (n)displaystyle K=mathrm SU (n).) Given a representation πdisplaystyle pi pi of gdisplaystyle mathfrak gmathfrak g on a vector space V,displaystyle V,V, we can first restrict πdisplaystyle pi pi to the Lie algebra kdisplaystyle mathfrak kmathfrakk of Kdisplaystyle KK. Then, since Kdisplaystyle KK is simply connected,[3] there is an associated representation Πdisplaystyle Pi Pi of Kdisplaystyle KK. We can then use integration over Kdisplaystyle KK to produce an inner product on Vdisplaystyle VV for which Πdisplaystyle Pi Pi is unitary.[4] Complete reducibility of Πdisplaystyle Pi Pi is then immediate and elementary arguments show that the original representation πdisplaystyle pi pi of gdisplaystyle mathfrak gmathfrak g is also completely reducible.


The usual algebraic proof makes use of the quadratic Casimir element of the universal enveloping algebra,[5] and can be seen as a consequence of Whitehead's lemma (see Weibel's homological algebra book).


We now explain briefly the role that the quadratic Casimir element Cdisplaystyle CC has in the proof. Since Cdisplaystyle CC is in the center of the universal enveloping algebra, Schur's lemma tells us that Cdisplaystyle CC acts as multiple cλdisplaystyle c_lambda c_lambda of the identity in the irreducible representation of gdisplaystyle mathfrak gmathfrak g with highest weight λdisplaystyle lambda lambda . A key point is to establish that cλdisplaystyle c_lambda c_lambda is nonzero whenever the representation is nontrivial. This can be done by a general argument [6] or by the explicit formula for cλdisplaystyle c_lambda c_lambda . We now consider a very special case of the theorem on complete reducibility: the case where a representation Vdisplaystyle VV contains a nontrivial, irreducible, invariant subspace Wdisplaystyle WW of codimension one. Let CVdisplaystyle C_VC_V denote the action of Cdisplaystyle CC on Vdisplaystyle VV. Since Vdisplaystyle VV is not irreducible, CVdisplaystyle C_VC_V is not necessarily a multiple of the identity, but it is a self-intertwining operator for Vdisplaystyle VV. Then the restriction of CVdisplaystyle C_VC_V to Wdisplaystyle WW is a nonzero multiple of the identity. But since the quotient V/Wdisplaystyle V/WV/W is a one dimensional—and therefore trivial—representation of gdisplaystyle mathfrak gmathfrak g, the action of Cdisplaystyle CC on the quotient is trivial. It then easily follows that CVdisplaystyle C_VC_V must have a nonzero kernel—and the kernel is an invariant subspace, since CVdisplaystyle C_VC_V is a self-intertwiner. The kernel is then a one-dimensional invariant subspace, whose intersection with Wdisplaystyle WW is zero. Thus, ker(VC)displaystyle mathrm ker (V_C)displaystyle mathrm ker (V_C) is an invariant complement to Wdisplaystyle WW, so that Vdisplaystyle VV decomposes as a direct sum of irreducible subspaces:



V=W⊕ker(CV)displaystyle V=Woplus mathrm ker (C_V)displaystyle V=Woplus mathrm ker (C_V).

Although we have so far established only a very special case of the desired result, this step is actually the critical one in the general argument.



External links


  • A blog post by Akhil Mathew


References




  1. ^ Hall 2015 Theorem 10.9


  2. ^ Knapp 2002 Theorem 6.11


  3. ^ Hall 2015 Theorem 5.10


  4. ^ Hall 2015 Theorem 4.28


  5. ^ Hall 2015 Section 10.3


  6. ^ Humphreys 1973 Section 6.2




  • Hall, Brian C. (2015). Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations: An Elementary Introduction. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. 222 (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN 978-3319134666. 


  • Humphreys, James E. (1973). Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. 9 (Second printing, revised ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-90053-5. 


  • Jacobson, Nathan, Lie algebras, Republication of the 1962 original. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1979. ISBN 0-486-63832-4


  • Knapp, Anthony W. (2002), Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, Progress in Mathematics, 140 (2nd ed.), Boston: Birkhäuser, ISBN 0-8176-4259-5 


  • Weibel, Charles A. (1995). An Introduction to Homological Algebra. Cambridge University Press. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Executable numpy error

Trying to Print Gridster Items to PDF without overlapping contents

Mass disable jenkins jobs